Pro and Con: International Drone Strikes

Some argue that drones strikes help prevent “boots on the ground” combat and makes America safer, that the strikes are legal under American and international law, and that they are carried out with the support of Americans and foreign governments, while others argue that drone strikes kill civilians, creating more terrorists than they kill and sowing animosity in foreign countries, that the strikes are extrajudicial and illegal, and create a dangerous disconnect between the horrors of war and soldiers carrying out the strikes.

Military drones are swarming the skies of Ukraine and other conflict hot spots – and anything goes when it comes to international law

Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies

International support for U.S. drone strikes. : r/dataisbeautiful

Biden finalizes new rules for US drone strikes

The US Military Has Been Waiting for a Drone War Like One in Ukraine

US: Russian fighter jet knocks American drone out of sky over Black Sea

Trump threat puts European role in lethal US drone strikes under new scrutiny - Amnesty International

The President's Inbox: The Killing of Qasem Soleimani

Do Drone Strikes Violate International Law ?

Drones in Ukraine and beyond: Everything you need to know

Drone Strike!: UCAVs and Unmanned Aerial Warfare in the 21st Century: Yenne, Bill: 9781580072380: : Books

Targeted Killings, Drone-Strikes & Pro-Active Measures in CT

Drone strikes threaten 50 years of international law, says UN rapporteur, Drones (military)

Drone Strikes Abroad - Pros & Cons - ProCon.org